Post any ban appeals or ban requests within this forum.
  • User avatar
  • User avatar
  • User avatar
  • User avatar

Is the entire situation with Lightbubls getting out of hand.

Yes, everyone should just move on.
7
21%
Yes, this needs to stop, NOW!
8
24%
No
12
35%
Other
7
21%
User avatar
By catsfuzz
#8413
I know there is another thread up at the moment but I would like to start a new one for specific reasons. First of all, the evidence is fresh and new (to the fourm). Also, it has diferent things that need to be adressed before viewing. First of all the taker of the picture would like to remain annonomyus (?) so their name is blacked out. I do have the original photo but will only give it to a Mod/Admin if I am asked and get approval from the taker. Okay, so here it is. Oh, and if this isn't good enough evidence I would like to know, what is?!?!?
Attachments
Ban Lightbulbs
Ban Lightbulbs
Lights.JPG (42.5 KiB) Viewed 3351 times
User avatar
By Smoothzcriminal
#8415
Wtf do you not get, EVERY thread you guys are shot down for no evidence and you insist to make another thread. You know whats getting out of control? The idiots who spam this section of the forums with stuff like this and since I know you are to lazy to read what Panthers said I will just copy and paste it hear but I bet that still to long for you to read.



I will go top down in response:

I haven't been online, thus no messages from you.

That is a rhetorical, annoying question, and so I will not answer it.

We have been through this 50,000 times: Lightbulbs trolls people he finds to be idiots. Obviously you must have done something to set him off. Obviously you must have also made the dumb mistake of feeding him by saying "OMG LIGHT SHUT UP!!!".

And correction: There are numerous accounts of people wanting lightbulbs banned for "being mean" or "griefing", when they provide no proof or are themselves the ones at fault.

Let me ask you this: Can you pick out for me one solid piece of evidence that should get lightbulbs banned? No? What about those six links you have there? OH WAIT. They are all failed ban requests for him, one of them by you, with no support or evidence whatsoever that all end in Light laughing at your face because the OP has gathered no sufficient proof to get him banned besides "he was being mean and harassing me and stealing and probably hacking".

It is a very serious accustation to say someone is using speedhacks / invisiblehacks / texpackhacks, and one accusing him of so has thus far ended in that person himself getting yelled at.

Furthermore: Look at the links you posted. They all failed miserably in getting him banned, because they posters had zero proof and / or were crying as the wrote it. Also.

The post you call Transparent Pack Hacking: This post has no proof whatsoever. It is him telling a fun folk-lore tale of how lightbulbs kills people. *clap clap*. Much to learn from this one.

He also blatantly accuses light of using a transparent tex pack, a very serious accusation like I said.

The post you call Griefing: This one had some impressive evidence, but it was wayyy back in the past and Lightbulbs has since been brought back to the server. Invalidated due to the fact that it no longer has an impact.

The post you call Scamming: You KNOW who lightbulbs is. You honestly agreed to meet him out in the wilderness? That is your own fault, people aren't punishable for what they do in the wilderness in this case.

The post you call Harassments: What happened here was a misunderstanding of the Realm Wars system. There were no clear definitions regarding this type of war-harassment, and so that was my own fault. It has been resolved and mitchie himself is at peace with the issue.

The post you call Bully: This post provides NO proof whatsoever. It is simply another person complaining about Lightbulbs being mean. That's not a valid post. Your credibility is slipping Dartz.

The post you call "being flat out mean": Seriously, Dartz? This complaint has no substance whatsoever. It's just two sentences that say "lightbulbs is being a big meanie."

The post you call More Harassment: Master admits that he has zero proof and acknowledges that it is just another post "crying" about lightbulbs. Invalidated.


So Why Does the Staff Like Lightbulbs?
Take a look at those posts again. Lightbulbs uses logic and actual evidence / comprehension of the actual in-game rules to defend himself, which turns out being easier than anyone could imagine, because look at the people that want him banned:

-They are either crying about him in all caps and swears, begging for him to get banned, crying about how the staff likes him, blatantly accusing him of hacking (probably raging from dying), or all of the above PLUS having zero proof to back there posts.

So I take lightbulbs' side because history has shown every. single. time. That lightbulbs is right when it comes to defending himself about bans. Keep in mind he has also BEEN THE REASON FOR getting EIGHT real griefers, dupers, etc banned. You can thank him for the removal of 31,000 duped diamonds and 50,000 duped iron that would have otherwise ruined the server.

Your move.
User avatar
By catsfuzz
#8418
I have read all of these before (trust me). I understand where you guys are coming from but this is solid evidence. So thank you for spamming all that stuff on the thread. Did you even look at the picture?
User avatar
By catsfuzz
#8420
Smoothzcriminal wrote:Do you not relies where that picture is from?
Yes, yes I do, becasue the person who took it e-mailed it directly to me!
User avatar
By terrancejones
#8422
You saved me the time of hunting down the original post... XD

Also, 1.3_01 photo, is not fresh. On the contrary, its rumored that 1.5 is coming next week. Also, that photo has no or [C] icons on the chat, meaning that this even happened before the classic mode was started. As a result, this is pretty old news. Now that I think about it, I think the very subject mentioned in the photo was already discussed with the parties involved, and has been dealt with.
User avatar
By catsfuzz
#8423
I don't really understand your question. It was taken by a person included in the conversation. I was talking to them and they told me they had screenshots. They gave me the screenshot and I posted here. Oh, and if you're looking for a name... TOO BAD! They don't want to be included in this. (Also, if I don't reply qickly [until tomorrow] it is because I have to go to bed. 10:30 P.M. here and I have 3 tests tomorrow :cry: )
User avatar
By Smoothzcriminal
#8426
http://minerealm.com/community/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=460

In this thread Jdankk states that he got a warning for the SAME screenshot, which you just posted so your posting an old screenshot which he took the punishment for, The name you blocked out was Mitchie151, You sir have to spend more then 5 seconds researching before you post the 15th Ban request on a man who saved the server of Diamond overload.
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]